Why continue?Now that's a question I ask myself from time-to-time. The work is not glamorous, it's controversial, I'm ostracized by my fellow creationists, my fellow geocentrists have their own agendas, as well they must considering it takes a maverick to be a geocentrist in the first place. Few contribute financially and fewer still contribute articles; my best supporters are a handful of believers and pastors, several of whom are in trouble with the government for their beliefs that the U.S. Constitution and not the United Nations charter is the law of the land, and that we still have religious freedom in America. So what's the use of continuing with geocentricity, a topic which is so marginalized that most people don't even know about it let along think that it's important?
Why continue? When God's words were established in the common tongues of the nations in the sixteenth century, those words exposed Rome for the monster it is and ended the Dark Ages. In an effort to ex tinguish the light of the Holy Bible so that the monster could restore the gories of the Dark Ages, her scholastics of the sixteenth century started to challenge the authenticity and veracity of the very words of God. The first (and only real) challenge was heliocentrism. All subsequent challenges to the authority of the Holy Bible: lower criticism, higher criticism, evolutionism, communism (which is Satanism under a different label), the Councils of Trent, Papal infallibility, Fascism, Democratism, etc., have all been based on the success of the Copernican Revolution. That is why we must continue, even in these days when men will not endure sound doctrine (2 Timothy 4:3).